|
Meanwhile, everyone else is doing it, and I’m going to as well. Post pictures of “The Gates,” I mean. We spent a little over two hours in Central Park yesterday, and I have to admit that I was both startled and awed by Christo and Jeanne-Claude’s mammoth public arts project than I ever thought I would be. The color brought to an otherwise barren landscape is magnificent. The layers of trees and gates, positioned forward and sideways creates an entirely different look for the park. The drapes flapping in the wind bring movement and life to the cool and crisp air while the empty tree branches simply sit still. The light hits the frames and the drapes in different ways, and your positioning will completely affect how any one gate looks at any one time. They create majestic borders for some spaces and delineate streaming and winding pathways for others. And I haven’t even mentioned my attempts at reconcile the conception and production of it all.
It will be difficult to ever look at Central Park the same way again. I don’t place a positive or negative connotation on that statement. The park is and (hopefully) always will be one of the most special and beautiful parts of this city. Walking through it now with this installation is a brand new experience, and every pathway helps you see the park, even parts with which you’re most familiar, for the first time. I anticipate that seeing the park with The Gates gone will be almost as startling as experiencing it for the first time seeing them there. I hear several people asking why this is art? Or what makes it art? They say they don’t get it. To me, art is about looking at something — a person, an object, an image, the world around you — in a way you may or may not have thought of before and having a reaction. That’s true for performance or visual arts. “The Gates” dramatically change Central Park any way you look at that — close-up, underneath, as a group from far away. “The Gates” have been added to the canvas of the park; and in under two weeks, they will be taken away. It doesn’t necessarily have to have some greater symbolism or meaning to be art, yet for each individual, it still may. I have my ideas, and they may differ from yours. But that’s OK too. That’s part of what makes it art. More photos after the jump … |


Someone told me to start off at the 86st entrance. How did you go about walking through it?
LikeLike
We entered at 81st street, turned left and went to the top of the hill and then heade downtown, across the south end of the Great Lawn, circled around up to Belvedere Castle, down through The Ramble to the Mall and then headed back out near Tavern on the Green at 67th. I don’t think there’s really any good or bad place to start or finish though. The only thing I would suggest is to go to some high points here and there.
LikeLike
Top Ten Most Common Questions About The Gates
10. Why?
9. Twenty-five million for drapes?
8. Will it improve my cell phone reception?
7. When I get mugged by a guy hiding behind a giant curtained arch, which city agency should I sue?
6. What’s this I hear about filling up Central Park with Crisco?
5. Where do I report a gate-jacking?
4. This is a joke, right?
3. If you rearrange the letters in “Christo” you can spell “Ostrich”.
2. Would you describe this more as a colossal waste of money or a colossal waste of time?
1. Is it urine-proof?
LikeLike
Listen, and this is kind of a note for everyone: If you’re going to post comments on this site, and especially if you’re lame enough to do it anonymously by including a fake email address or a name like “not art,” AND if you’re point is to argue something I’m saying, how about being clever or intelligent yourself rather than simply cribbing bits from David Letterman. At least give credit to their show when you’re being so damn unoriginal.
LikeLike